Nevercallmebyname wrote...
All I expect is that a hak to add content from a non DND setting include enough content for me to actually play in that setting if I felt like it.
That sounds like a fair expectation right?
No, it does not sound like a fair expectation. Everyone makes as much or as little as they like, for fun, and that's just how it should be.
In another thread, you said to Bannor Bloodfist:
Nevercallmebyname wrote...
Instead of telling people to give up and go home, have you considered encouraging people to stick with their projects long enough to finish them?
Setting aside the fact that Bannor successfully encouraged teams of content makers for
years (a fact of which you seem unaware?), an analogous question might be: "Instead of criticising what you find lacking, have you considered filling the gap yourself?"
You mention "making" a big creature hakpak in the future, but the fact that you have, for instance, asked others to make a bugbear replacement for you makes me suspect that you mean you'll be compiling a hak of other people's work rather than making your own unique creatures. Don't get me wrong: I have no problem with compilation haks, nor with people making requests. In fact, I often find it enjoyable to fulfil people's CC requests. But if you're going to leave it up to other people to do this stuff, I don't think you should expect your criticism of certain gaps to be ecstatically received. Bear in mind that the vast majority of us who can now create original content started with no knowledge of 3d modelling. If we can learn, why shouldn't you?
