Author Topic: ghostly visage?  (Read 586 times)

Legacy_ShadowM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1373
  • Karma: +0/-0
ghostly visage?
« on: July 07, 2013, 08:10:51 am »


               Is ghostly visage a real spell? If not what a similar spell from 3.5 spell compendium or core books. Same level. Thanks all.
               
               

               
            

Legacy_Squatting Monk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 776
  • Karma: +0/-0
ghostly visage?
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2013, 09:16:10 pm »


               I don't think it's a PnP spell, but there is a creature called a Ghostly Visage in the Fiend Folio. It can be taken as a familiar.
               
               

               
            

Legacy_Shadooow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7698
  • Karma: +0/-0
ghostly visage?
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2013, 09:49:24 pm »


               seems like bioware's made up

same goes for the successor of it

closest spell is blur
               
               

               
            

Legacy_ShadowM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1373
  • Karma: +0/-0
ghostly visage?
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2013, 09:56:34 pm »


               Thanks you two. lol ShaDoow that what I was thinking too. I think I might switch it over to blur. What you thoughts on concealment in NWN it a little different than normal PNP should I also add Faerie Fire spell? Thanks I look also at it successor for a replacement.
               
               

               
            

Legacy_Shadooow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7698
  • Karma: +0/-0
ghostly visage?
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2013, 10:22:30 pm »


               y faerie fire definitely a must for a druid '<img'>, there is also glitterdust think it has similar effect but since its wiz spell i think its useless since wiz have see invis
               
               

               
            

Legacy_ShadowM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1373
  • Karma: +0/-0
ghostly visage?
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2013, 10:26:48 pm »


               Thanks '<img'> ok back to work ugh