Tim.G wrote...
I bought a second GTX 280 (apparently the last one that they had at NewEgg) just to have a spare. Lucky thing as my wife's Dell 8400 (very old) had an X1300 512mb card that couldn't keep up with 4 players in Dark's Eye of the Beholder. I installed the spare with a 650watt Ultra power supply. On the toughest screen (foggy area by Dwarven pit) the FPS went from 8-12 to 60-100. This PC was bought in 2004 and is a single core 3.2ghz with XP Pro. I am amazed at how good it is doing with the new parts
Video Graphics cards have ALWAYS been the most important part of gaming PCs, but Intel keeps trying to convince everyone that CPUs are more important. Â
I have made the 512 MB part of your comment stand out because it is so totally meaningless for an X1300, or a G-210, etc to have more than 128 MBs of VRAM. Â
They are both way too slow, and have far too narrow (64 bit) of a memory system transfer width. Â On a normal basis, they use 64 MB size texture units, and extremely rarely can swap two blocks that size back and forth, putting 128 MBs to work. Â Anything past that is totally wasted at gaming animation rates. Â Manufactrurers know that large numbers mislead the average customers, so they get a lot of the cheapest, lowest quality VRAM, and pile it on thick. Â
If you really want 512 MBs of VRAM to be properly used, you get a solution with a 256 bit memory system, and / or very fast memory matched to a very fast core speed. Â