SuperFly_2000 wrote...
Isn't there something for persistent world creators?
Nope.
As has been stated elsewhere, the AME doesn't have enough members that are involved with Persistent Worlds.
The request remains for folks that wish to have PW content involved, to get involved themselves with the AME.
It requires time to peruse multiple PW's, play through them to an extent to be able to make a valid judgement on the content, writing, DM'ing etc...
There is also the Conflict of Interest rules. If you are involved in a specific PW, then you can not nominate, nor judge anything to do with that specific PW, nor likely any other PW that is in competition with you.
That last bit makes it really tough. Most folks appear to play on a single PW only, and don't have the time to go play on others. Once they hang around that PW for a length of time, they tend to get involved in other ways too (besides just playing) and this recuses them from being able to judge if they become a "participating creator" for that PW. This would mean, a player that hangs around long enough to become a DM, is excluded from judging their own PW as they have a conflict of interest there.
Please note: The above "Assumes" that the strict Conflict of Interest rules used by the AME for SP content is applied to the PW content. However, since there are not enough PW players involved currently in the AME, there are no "standards" to choose from/against or rules in place, OR content related categories that have been created yet.
What all of this means, is that the AME desparately needs new members in relation to PW content, and could always use new members for the SP environment as well. If you join now, to help with the PW content arena, you get to help decide what categories should be awarded, and what "rules" are followed for those categories.
Modifié par Bannor Bloodfist, 18 septembre 2011 - 06:02 .