I also disagree with a monk's lack of need for DEX.
I don't get what and who people are disagreeing with.
The following is the exact indexed question which I was answering
3. Aside from increasing the monk's AC and Reflexes,
what else does Dexterity do for the monk class?As far as i know both the Attack Roll and the Damage Roll is based on strength (without weapon finesse feat)... so, aside from AC, what else does Dexterity affect for the monk class?
In other words the OP is looking to see if there is some special feature with dexterity that a monk has that would not be part of the generic strength versus dexterity comparison. I know he only mentioned AC and reflex, versus strength and damage and not other features like stealth that might also be part of a generic strength versus dexterity comparison, but for a monk there is no armor check penalty, making the point rather moot.
Except unlike other classes monks cannot go strength and wear heavy armor to compensate for the lack of dex AC. I don't see why you're fixated on uncanny dodge, you shouldn't be flat footed anyway.
In other words, monks are even more reliant on dex than a rogue is because a full plate rogue gone strength will have better AC.
So monks depend on Dex for AB, AC, Reflex saves, and potentially Stealth. Going Str as a monk is a dangerous choice and very environment dependent.
Yet the very things that the OP asked for me not to address in answering his question I am being accused of unfairly ignoring. And full plate is not an issue (though a shield would be) because a monk with 14 dex, 14 Wis, and 20 levels can easily outdo the full plate base plus max dexterity. Full plate by itself is not a reason why even a strength based monk would lag behind AC-wise. Even so, you are just arguing how strength lags, not how dexterity gives further benefits to the monk class than the normal conditions.
Why did the OP ask the question if he is ruling out the major benefits? Might be because he saw that dexterity was a monk's primary ability from a wiki article. Maybe he wanted a dexterity versus wisdom rationale. My reply adequately showed that there are no special considerations that give monks significantly more power than when giving dexterity to another class. So far all I am seeing for responses to my post are people taking the post out of context so that they can argue with it. If you are going to do that why not argue with the points that are wrong from the previous post, such as "I think that Stunning Fist and Quivering Palm can be used with kamas but I'm not sure". Easy to say no to that. I bring up that dexterity doesn't give much innately to the monk class once the usual strength versus dexterity reasons are dismissed, and I am accused of dismissing the benefits of AC in a reply where AC is specifically stated not to be considered. Good luck arguing for argument's sake.