Author Topic: Phantasmal Hak Packs...  (Read 564 times)

Legacy_Kalindor

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: +0/-0
Phantasmal Hak Packs...
« on: February 10, 2011, 06:23:00 pm »


                 The module I've been making has suddenly started complaining that four ProjectQ haks and my own top hack are not present to open the module even though they are clearly there in the hak directory and can be opened with Nwhak. Other modules I add these haks to behave similarly. I noticed that the toolset also does not build automatically anymore when changing the custom content installed on a mod. It just started today after I swapped NwNCQ for the modular NwNCQ hak system (although I obviously do not blame these haks for the issue).
  If this behavior is typical of some problem that someone has encountered before, I'd love to know the solution you used. I can post system specs if its relevant, but it was working just fine on this computer for many months so I doubt it is a hardware incompatibility. I am running Win7.
               
               

               
            

Legacy_HipMaestro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2849
  • Karma: +0/-0
Phantasmal Hak Packs...
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2011, 08:17:05 pm »


               Better posted in Custom Content unless someone who frequents that area stumbles by.  Just a suggestion for faster turnover.
               
               

               
            

Legacy_Kalindor

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: +0/-0
Phantasmal Hak Packs...
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2011, 09:40:44 pm »


               Thanks, I'll do so. I just didn't want someone there to say "Post in tech support, n00b!" '<img'>
               
               

               
            

Legacy_Zwerkules

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Karma: +0/-0
Phantasmal Hak Packs...
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2011, 03:07:49 pm »


               

Kalindor wrote...

Thanks, I'll do so. I just didn't want someone there to say "Post in tech support, n00b!" '<img'>


You obviously don't know the custom content forum very well if you expected an answer like that there. '<img'>